Milwaukee County’s judicial and political worlds are buzzing after Judge Hannah Dugan was unexpectedly charged with federal offenses—allegedly for helping Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an undocumented immigrant, slip past Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at the courthouse. The startling incident, which unfolded on April 18, 2025, has ignited a fierce debate over the limits of judicial authority and immigration enforcement.
The Shocking Incident
According to federal prosecutors, Judge Dugan was present in the courthouse when ICE agents arrived to arrest Flores-Ruiz, who was there for a misdemeanor domestic abuse hearing. Witnesses say that Dugan appeared visibly distressed and reportedly told the agents to seek guidance from the court’s chief judge. Then, sources say, she discreetly escorted Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a rarely used, non-public exit—allowing them to escape undetected. Flores-Ruiz was later caught outside the courthouse after a brief chase.
On April 25, 2025, the FBI arrested Judge Dugan, charging her with obstruction of justice and helping an individual evade arrest. She was released on her own recognizance but now faces serious legal battles ahead.
The Defense’s Position
Judge Dugan’s attorneys, led by renowned former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, have quickly pushed back, arguing that her actions are shielded by judicial immunity. They emphasize that guiding courtroom procedures and maintaining order are part of her official duties—citing recent Supreme Court decisions, including the notable 2023 Trump v. United States case, which broadened protections for officials acting in their official capacity.
Defense officials warn that prosecuting a judge for actions taken in her courtroom could threaten judicial independence and set a dangerous precedent for future cases.
Public and Political Reactions
The case has become a flashpoint across the nation. Over 150 former judges and advocacy groups have voiced concern, warning that these charges threaten the very foundation of judicial independence and might send a chilling message to courts everywhere.
On the other side, political figures and officials from the Trump administration have publicly defended the prosecution. Attorney General Pam Bondi emphasized that “no one is above the law,” underscoring the importance of enforcing immigration laws fairly and consistently.
Local leaders in Wisconsin haven’t stayed silent either. Governor Tony Evers and Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson criticized the arrest, arguing it could erode public trust in the justice system and discourage participation in future legal proceedings.
A Temporary Halt
In light of the controversy, the Wisconsin Supreme Court announced a temporary suspension of Judge Dugan’s duties on April 29, 2025, to preserve confidence in the judiciary. A reserve judge has stepped in to handle her caseload while the case unfolds.
What’s Next?
Judge Dugan maintains her innocence and has pleaded not guilty. Her trial, scheduled to start on July 21, 2025, promises to be a pivotal moment. If convicted, she faces up to six years in prison and fines reaching $350,000—a stark reminder of the stakes involved.
This case isn’t just about one judge or one immigration matter; it’s a national litmus test on the boundaries of judicial authority, immigration policy, and the rule of law. Stay tuned for what promises to be a consequential legal showdown.
